The Effective Altruism (EA) community has seen substantial growth, but many of its leading thinkers now publish work that is increasingly specialized or academic. This creates a gap for the broader EA community, as key ideas from prolific authors like Will MacAskill or Toby Ord become less accessible to the average reader. A curated collection of summaries or excerpts of their most important works could bridge this divide, making these ideas more digestible without oversimplifying them.
One approach might involve a contest—similar to the compilation of Robin Hanson's best blog posts—where contributors submit condensed, high-quality summaries of key EA writings. Alternatively, this could be an ongoing project where the community regularly updates and refines summaries. A dedicated platform, such as a wiki or simple website, could host these summaries, organized by author or topic. To ensure quality, peer review or editorial oversight could be implemented. The goal wouldn’t be exhaustive documentation but rather highlighting the most impactful ideas in an accessible way.
This project could serve several groups:
Contributors could be motivated by recognition (e.g., featured contributions), small prizes (in a contest format), or the satisfaction of advancing EA knowledge. EA organizations might support the initiative through grants or partnerships.
Starting small could help validate the idea—for example, a pilot contest summarizing a select few authors. If successful, the project could expand into a community-driven platform with structured navigation and quality control. To avoid redundancy with existing platforms like the EA Forum or LessWrong, summaries could be cross-posted or linked, positioning this as a complementary resource rather than a competitor.
In summary, a well-curated repository of EA thought leaders’ key ideas could fill a noticeable gap in accessibility while fostering deeper engagement across the community. Testing demand with a small-scale effort would help gauge its feasibility before scaling up.
Hours To Execute (basic)
Hours to Execute (full)
Estd No of Collaborators
Financial Potential
Impact Breadth
Impact Depth
Impact Positivity
Impact Duration
Uniqueness
Implementability
Plausibility
Replicability
Market Timing
Project Type
Content