Strategic Advocacy for Animal Welfare in International Institutions
Strategic Advocacy for Animal Welfare in International Institutions
International institutions like the World Bank, WTO, and OIE shape policies affecting animal welfare in emerging economies through lending conditions, trade agreements, and technical standards. However, these institutions often deprioritize animal welfare in favor of economic development. There's no coordinated effort to systematically advocate for animal welfare within these influential bodies that operate across multiple countries.
A Strategic Approach to Institutional Change
One way to address this gap would be to identify and engage with the highest-impact institutions through a structured process:
- First, research which institutions have the most leverage over animal welfare policies in different regions, analyzing their mechanisms of influence
- Then prioritize 1-2 institutions where advocacy could create cascading effects, considering factors like openness to external input and policy windows
- Develop tailored strategies for each target, such as producing economic-focused policy briefs, building relationships with officials, or forming NGO coalitions
The approach would adapt regionally based on which institutions are most influential and what welfare issues are most pressing, creating alignment with local contexts.
Why Target International Institutions?
Focusing on these organizations offers several advantages over country-by-country advocacy:
- A single policy change in an institution can affect practices across multiple emerging economies simultaneously
- Institutions often have technical assistance programs that could help implement welfare improvements
- Many institutions already have sustainability mandates where animal welfare could logically fit
Key beneficiaries would include animals affected by institutional policies, local NGOs lacking international access, and policymakers seeking comprehensive welfare frameworks.
Testing and Implementing the Approach
An initial phase could involve:
- Researching the highest-potential institutions and developing test policy proposals
- Conducting informational interviews with current/former staff to assess receptivity
- Securing introductory meetings with mid-level officials to validate the approach
Later phases might focus on piloting small policy changes in lending programs or technical standards, then expanding to additional institutions while developing regional implementation strategies.
This approach differs from existing efforts by specializing in institutional leverage points relevant to emerging economies, rather than focusing on single issues or developed markets. The economic framing and systemic perspective could create more sustainable improvements in animal welfare policies globally.
Hours To Execute (basic)
Hours to Execute (full)
Estd No of Collaborators
Financial Potential
Impact Breadth
Impact Depth
Impact Positivity
Impact Duration
Uniqueness
Implementability
Plausibility
Replicability
Market Timing
Project Type
Service