Insecticides in agriculture cause widespread suffering to insects, often killing them indiscriminately while failing to provide long-term pest control. This creates a cycle where insects—many of which may already experience net negative lives—face unnecessary harm without clear benefits to ecosystems or farmers. One way to address this could be replacing or supplementing chemical insecticides with physical shielding methods that block pests without lethal measures.
Instead of killing insects, barriers like nets, screens, or controlled environments (e.g., greenhouses) could prevent pests from reaching crops. Designs might selectively exclude harmful insects while allowing pollinators to pass through. For example:
This approach could reduce reliance on insecticides, aligning with insect welfare goals while maintaining crop yields. Farmers might adopt these methods if they prove cost-effective or attract ethically conscious consumers.
Current alternatives like Integrated Pest Management (IPM) or organic farming still sometimes use lethal controls. Physical shielding could offer clearer welfare benefits by:
However, challenges like pest adaptability or higher upfront costs would need testing through small-scale pilots.
A minimal starting point could involve:
If early results are promising, the approach could expand through collaborations with ethical brands or agricultural cooperatives.
Hours To Execute (basic)
Hours to Execute (full)
Estd No of Collaborators
Financial Potential
Impact Breadth
Impact Depth
Impact Positivity
Impact Duration
Uniqueness
Implementability
Plausibility
Replicability
Market Timing
Project Type
Physical Product