Social media platforms thrive on engagement, yet the process of unfollowing someone is often abrupt and leaves the unfollowed party without any meaningful feedback. This lack of context can lead to confusion and frustration, while platforms miss out on valuable data about why users disengage with certain accounts. Addressing this gap could improve content relevance, reduce churn, and foster better interactions between users and creators.
One way to make unfollowing more constructive would be to introduce a simple feedback mechanism. After clicking "unfollow," users could select from a list of common reasons (e.g., "Too many posts," "Irrelevant content," "Offensive material") or provide a brief optional comment. This feedback could remain anonymous to the unfollowed person but be aggregated for the platform to analyze. For example:
For users, this system provides a way to express preferences without confrontation. For creators, anonymized insights could help them adapt without direct criticism. Platforms, meanwhile, would gain actionable data to improve engagement. To avoid overwhelm, feedback could default to one-click options with an optional text field—minimizing friction while still capturing useful input.
An MVP might start with a handful of common reasons in a dismissible popup, tested with a small user segment. Later iterations could expand options and explore sharing summarized trends with creators as a premium feature. Existing solutions (like LinkedIn’s unfollow prompts for company pages) show this can work for business accounts—extending it to personal profiles would provide even deeper insights.
By making unfollows more informative, social platforms could turn disengagement into an opportunity to refine content and strengthen community trust.
Hours To Execute (basic)
Hours to Execute (full)
Estd No of Collaborators
Financial Potential
Impact Breadth
Impact Depth
Impact Positivity
Impact Duration
Uniqueness
Implementability
Plausibility
Replicability
Market Timing
Project Type
Digital Product