Many people struggle to maintain good habits despite knowing their benefits. Traditional habit trackers use positive reinforcement like rewards and streaks, but these often fail when motivation dips. This creates an opportunity for alternative approaches that leverage different psychological triggers—specifically, the strong aversion people feel toward supporting causes they disagree with.
One way to approach habit formation could be through negative reinforcement tied to ideological commitments. Users would:
The psychological premise is that the discomfort of funding an opposed cause would provide stronger motivation than traditional reward systems. Verification could range from manual check-ins to integration with other apps that track activity.
While apps like Beeminder charge users for missed goals, they keep the money as profit. Other platforms allow donations to neutral or positive causes. This approach stands out by directing funds to organizations users actively oppose, potentially creating a more powerful emotional incentive. For example:
An MVP could start with basic habit tracking and a limited selection of controversial causes. Key safeguards might include:
The system would need to carefully balance motivational effectiveness with ethical considerations, particularly around how recipient organizations are selected and whether they can refuse these conditional donations.
Hours To Execute (basic)
Hours to Execute (full)
Estd No of Collaborators
Financial Potential
Impact Breadth
Impact Depth
Impact Positivity
Impact Duration
Uniqueness
Implementability
Plausibility
Replicability
Market Timing
Project Type
Digital Product