Effective Altruism Awards Program for Community Contributions

Effective Altruism Awards Program for Community Contributions

Summary: The effective altruism community lacks structured recognition for valuable contributions, risking demotivation and missed learning opportunities. A community-wide awards program with expert-reviewed categories could systematically highlight impactful work across research, operations, and community building, using blind reviews and clear impact criteria to ensure fairness and maintain EA's focus on effectiveness.

The effective altruism community, while strong in critical thinking and impact evaluation, currently lacks structured ways to recognize and celebrate valuable contributions. This gap means many important efforts go unnoticed, especially those outside major organizations, potentially missing opportunities to motivate contributors and highlight exemplary work for others to learn from.

How Recognition Could Work

One approach could involve creating a community-wide awards program that systematically identifies outstanding contributions across different areas of effective altruism. This might include:

  • Multiple categories covering research, community building, and operational work
  • A nomination process combining community input with expert review
  • Clear criteria focused on impact and effectiveness rather than popularity
  • Both digital recognition and in-person award ceremonies at major events

The program could particularly benefit those doing less visible but crucial work, while giving newcomers clearer examples of what valuable contributions look like in practice.

Making It Work in Practice

A pilot version might start with a small working group designing initial categories and running a test nomination process through existing EA platforms. Early versions could focus on learning what types of recognition the community finds most valuable before scaling up. To address potential challenges like bias toward well-known figures, some categories might use blind review processes or have separate tracks for different experience levels.

Building on Existing Efforts

While some EA groups and programs already highlight valuable work (like forum prizes or grant recipient spotlights), a more comprehensive awards program could complement these by recognizing a wider range of contributions. Unlike existing recognition that often focuses on written content or funded projects, this could systematically celebrate impactful work regardless of its format or funding status.

Such a program could strengthen community morale while maintaining EA's focus on impact - by making the recognition itself a tool for identifying and spreading particularly effective approaches to doing good.

Source of Idea:
Skills Needed to Execute This Idea:
Community EngagementImpact EvaluationEvent PlanningProgram DevelopmentBias MitigationPublic RelationsStakeholder AnalysisRecognition Systems DesignProcess OptimizationInterpersonal Communication
Categories:Effective AltruismCommunity BuildingAwards And RecognitionImpact EvaluationMotivation And EngagementNonprofit Management

Hours To Execute (basic)

200 hours to execute minimal version ()

Hours to Execute (full)

500 hours to execute full idea ()

Estd No of Collaborators

1-10 Collaborators ()

Financial Potential

$0–1M Potential ()

Impact Breadth

Affects 1K-100K people ()

Impact Depth

Moderate Impact ()

Impact Positivity

Probably Helpful ()

Impact Duration

Impacts Lasts 3-10 Years ()

Uniqueness

Somewhat Unique ()

Implementability

Implementable with Effort ()

Plausibility

Logically Sound ()

Replicability

Moderately Difficult to Replicate ()

Market Timing

Good Timing ()

Project Type

Service

Project idea submitted by u/idea-curator-bot.
Submit feedback to the team