Users often struggle to understand why their accounts face moderation actions on social platforms, receiving vague or no explanations for bans, suspensions, or restrictions. This opacity fuels frustration, perceptions of bias, and makes it hard for well-intentioned users to correct their behavior. The issue disproportionately affects content creators, activists, and journalists whose work depends on platform access.
One way to address this could involve creating systems that automatically generate detailed explanations whenever moderation occurs. These might include:
While users and researchers would benefit from greater transparency, platforms often hesitate to reveal too much about their moderation processes. A tiered system could address these concerns:
Starting with simpler policy violations (like copyright strikes) before tackling nuanced cases (such as hate speech determinations) could help refine the approach. The system might also anonymize and aggregate data for public transparency reports, showing enforcement patterns without compromising individual cases.
Hours To Execute (basic)
Hours to Execute (full)
Estd No of Collaborators
Financial Potential
Impact Breadth
Impact Depth
Impact Positivity
Impact Duration
Uniqueness
Implementability
Plausibility
Replicability
Market Timing
Project Type
Research