Farm animal welfare (FAW) reforms have seen significant progress in high-income countries, but adoption in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been inconsistent. Understanding whether this gap is driven by economic constraints, cultural factors, or governance challenges could help prioritize advocacy efforts and tailor strategies for faster adoption. This research could also reveal whether LMICs are likely to follow the same FAW reform trajectory as wealthier nations as their economies grow.

Investigating the Link Between Economics and FAW Reforms

One way to explore this relationship would be to analyze historical data on FAW reforms—such as legislation, industry standards, and public awareness campaigns—across LMICs over the past few decades. By comparing these trends with economic indicators like GDP per capita, income inequality, and agricultural GDP share, it might be possible to identify patterns. Countries where FAW progress deviates from economic expectations could be studied further through case reviews and expert interviews to uncover additional influences, such as cultural attitudes or political leadership.

Potential Impact and Stakeholder Benefits

The findings could help animal welfare organizations allocate resources more effectively by identifying regions where reforms are most likely to gain traction. Policymakers in LMICs might use the insights to anticipate future regulatory shifts, while agricultural businesses could prepare for changing consumer demands. International development agencies could also integrate FAW considerations into broader economic programs.

Execution and MVP Approach

A phased approach could start with compiling and analyzing existing data on FAW reforms and economic indicators in a select group of LMICs. An MVP might consist of a white paper summarizing preliminary findings from 5-10 countries with reliable data. Later phases could expand to deeper case studies and predictive modeling based on economic growth forecasts.

By clarifying the relationship between economic development and FAW reforms, this research could provide actionable insights for advocates, policymakers, and businesses working to improve animal welfare in LMICs.