Many online communities, whether professional networks, hobby groups, or cause-based collectives, struggle to keep members engaged. While platforms like Slack and Discord offer basic communication tools, they often lack structured ways to encourage meaningful interactions. This can lead to inactive "ghost towns" where members join but rarely participate, diminishing the group's value. Organizers, who invest significant effort into building these communities, are highly motivated to fix this issue but lack tailored solutions.
One way to address this gap would be to create a lightweight toolkit or platform specifically designed to boost member engagement. This could take several forms:
The goal would be to reduce the effort required for organizers to design engagement strategies while making participation effortless for members.
This approach could benefit multiple groups:
An MVP could start with free, open-source templates (e.g., a Notion doc or Slack plugin) featuring basic engagement prompts. Testing with volunteer organizers could help refine features before scaling to a standalone tool or deeper platform integrations.
Unlike general community platforms like Circle.so or single-feature plugins like Donut, this idea would specialize in structured engagement tools while remaining adaptable to existing platforms. A freemium model could offer basic features for free, with premium analytics or automation as paid upgrades. The niche focus on engagement could make it harder for broader platforms to replicate while allowing network effects as groups share successful templates.
By addressing the specific challenge of fostering interaction in online communities, this approach could help organizers create more vibrant groups without overwhelming complexity.
Hours To Execute (basic)
Hours to Execute (full)
Estd No of Collaborators
Financial Potential
Impact Breadth
Impact Depth
Impact Positivity
Impact Duration
Uniqueness
Implementability
Plausibility
Replicability
Market Timing
Project Type
Digital Product