A Football Manager Game with Unethical Decision Making
A Football Manager Game with Unethical Decision Making
Sports video games often highlight the glory of competition while ignoring the darker realities of professional athletics—corruption, match-fixing, and backroom deals. There’s an opportunity to explore these themes through a football (soccer) management simulator that blends traditional gameplay with illicit decision-making, offering players a satirical yet thought-provoking experience.
A Darker Take on Sports Management
The idea involves a management game where success hinges not just on squad tactics but also on unethical moves. Players could:
- Bribe referees to sway match outcomes
- Negotiate secret deals with opposing players to underperform
- Influence officials for favorable fixtures or rulings
Every action carries risk—higher bribes improve success odds but increase the chance of exposure, leading to fines, point deductions, or even relegation. The goal would be to balance legitimacy and corruption while managing reputation, finances, and plausible deniability.
Standing Out in the Market
Unlike conventional sports sims like Football Manager, which focuses purely on fair play, this concept introduces an entirely new layer of strategy. Similarities could be drawn to games like Cart Life (which simulates economic struggle) or The Guild (where underhanded tactics are key), but applying this to sports would create a fresh, edgy twist. The satirical angle might attract players tired of sanitized sports games while sparking conversations about real-world issues.
Execution & Considerations
A minimal viable product (MVP) could start with basic corruption mechanics layered onto a simple management sim, then expand:
- Core Systems: Build bribery, detection, and consequence mechanics.
- Depth: Add narrative elements (e.g., news reports, fan backlash) to reinforce consequences.
- Mitigating Risk: Use fictional leagues to avoid real-world backlash, and ensure gameplay doesn’t glorify corruption—for example, by making long-term success require balancing ethics and exploitation.
Monetization could follow a premium model, with potential DLC (new leagues, corruption types) or cosmetics, though microtransactions might feel too ironic.
While controversial, this approach could carve out a niche by blending familiar sports management with uncharted, morally gray mechanics—making players question how far they’d go to win.
Hours To Execute (basic)
Hours to Execute (full)
Estd No of Collaborators
Financial Potential
Impact Breadth
Impact Depth
Impact Positivity
Impact Duration
Uniqueness
Implementability
Plausibility
Replicability
Market Timing
Project Type
Digital Product