Many philanthropists and endowed institutions struggle with a critical dilemma: the tension between growing their wealth for future impact and the risk of never deploying it effectively. This "philanthropic hoarding" can delay or prevent resources from reaching urgent needs, undermining the very purpose of giving. One way to address this could be through structured mechanisms that ensure timely and intentional deployment of wealth.
Two initial approaches could help balance wealth accumulation with impact:
More sophisticated, dynamic mechanisms could also be explored—for example, algorithms that adjust giving based on real-time data like disaster events or investment returns. These could reduce the arbitrariness of fixed rules while still ensuring accountability.
Philanthropists may resist constraints, fearing loss of flexibility, while beneficiaries prefer predictable funding. Investment managers, whose fees often depend on assets under management, might oppose mechanisms that reduce perpetual holdings. To address this, these tools could be positioned as impact-enhancing rather than restrictive, with customizable options to align with individual goals.
A phased approach could help test and refine the idea:
Existing models, like mandatory foundation payouts or the Giving Pledge, show partial solutions but lack enforceability or adaptability. By adding structured, goal-aligned mechanisms, philanthropy could become more responsive and impactful.
This approach could turn good intentions into measurable results, ensuring wealth serves its purpose when it’s needed most.
Hours To Execute (basic)
Hours to Execute (full)
Estd No of Collaborators
Financial Potential
Impact Breadth
Impact Depth
Impact Positivity
Impact Duration
Uniqueness
Implementability
Plausibility
Replicability
Market Timing
Project Type
Service