Many professionals face challenges when making career decisions due to limited perspectives, cognitive biases, and a lack of structured feedback. Traditional career counseling often provides one-directional advice, while casual peer conversations lack rigor. One way to address this gap could be through structured group discussions where members present their career plans and receive multi-perspective feedback in a format inspired by Shark Tank’s pitch-and-debate model.
In this setup, participants would take turns presenting their career plans in a structured format, followed by a group discussion where others provide feedback, challenge assumptions, and suggest alternatives. Variants of this approach could include:
This format could benefit early-to-mid career professionals, career changers, and specialized workers who may not find standard career advice applicable.
Participants would gain diverse perspectives and access to networks, while organizers could build a valuable professional community. To test the idea, a small group of 5-10 trusted colleagues could meet monthly with a facilitator to refine the format. Over time, this could scale into multiple groups, virtual participation, or facilitator training programs.
Unlike traditional career counseling, this method leverages collective wisdom rather than a single expert’s advice. Compared to mastermind groups, it offers a more structured debate format focused specifically on career decisions. And unlike anonymous online forums, discussions would be in-depth and accountable, with participants who understand each other’s contexts.
By combining preparation pressure, structured challenge, and practical support, this approach could help professionals make more thoughtful career decisions than existing methods alone.
Hours To Execute (basic)
Hours to Execute (full)
Estd No of Collaborators
Financial Potential
Impact Breadth
Impact Depth
Impact Positivity
Impact Duration
Uniqueness
Implementability
Plausibility
Replicability
Market Timing
Project Type
Service