Social media platforms often prioritize users with high follower counts, assuming this equates to influence. However, this approach has flaws: follower counts can be inflated artificially, many large accounts have low engagement, and smaller but highly engaged accounts are overlooked. This misalignment between perceived and actual influence reduces recommendation quality and limits discoverability of valuable content.
One way to address this could be to modify recommendation algorithms to prioritize engagement metrics—likes, retweets, replies—over follower counts. Instead of assuming popularity equals value, the system could analyze:
This would surface accounts that genuinely resonate with audiences, whether they have 1,000 or 1 million followers. To ensure relevance, engagement could also be analyzed within specific topics or communities.
Highly engaged users (e.g., niche experts) and regular users would benefit from more meaningful recommendations. Advertisers could identify truly influential partners, while the platform might see improved retention. However, high-follower accounts with low engagement might resist the change. To mitigate this, the shift could be introduced gradually, with clear communication about its benefits, such as reduced bot interference and better audience targeting.
A simple starting point could be an "Engagement-Based Recommendations" tab alongside existing suggestions. Early testing could focus on:
Over time, the approach could evolve based on user feedback, with safeguards against manipulation (e.g., detecting fake replies) to maintain trust.
By focusing on engagement over vanity metrics, social platforms could create a fairer ecosystem where quality content—not just popularity—rises to the top.
Hours To Execute (basic)
Hours to Execute (full)
Estd No of Collaborators
Financial Potential
Impact Breadth
Impact Depth
Impact Positivity
Impact Duration
Uniqueness
Implementability
Plausibility
Replicability
Market Timing
Project Type
Research