Research on State Health Insurance Mandate Effects Using Self Insured Firms

Research on State Health Insurance Mandate Effects Using Self Insured Firms

Summary: This research examines the broader impacts of state health insurance mandates by using a "natural experiment" framework, comparing self-insured firms (exempt from state mandates) with non-self-insured firms. By analyzing outcomes like unpaid hospital care costs, patient deductibles, and provider revenues, the study aims to provide policymakers with evidence for designing healthcare policies that balance coverage and affordability.

State health insurance mandates—laws requiring health plans to cover specific treatments or providers—are widespread in the U.S., but their broader effects remain poorly understood. For example, do they reduce hospitals’ unpaid care burdens? How do they influence deductibles or provider incomes? Answering these questions could help policymakers design fairer, more effective healthcare systems.

How the research could work

One approach would be to compare firms that self-insure (and are exempt from state mandates due to federal law) with firms that don’t, using datasets like MEPS-IC. This "natural experiment" could reveal causal effects by isolating mandate impacts from other factors. The study might examine:

  • Uncompensated hospital care costs
  • Changes to patient deductibles and copays
  • Provider revenue and employment shifts

Advanced econometric methods, like difference-in-differences analysis, could address challenges such as states with stronger mandates also having other pro-healthcare policies.

Why this could fill gaps in existing research

Prior studies often focused narrowly—for example, analyzing single mandate types or just cost impacts. This project could advance understanding by:

  • Breadth: Studying multiple mandate types and outcomes simultaneously
  • Innovation: Leveraging self-insured firms as a novel control group
  • Policy relevance: Providing timely insights as healthcare reform debates continue

Potential execution path

A phased approach might start with a literature review and data validation, followed by econometric analysis and policy-focused dissemination. Early stages could test key assumptions, like whether self-insured firms truly mirror broader trends. Funding might come from health policy grants, with findings shared through academic papers and briefings for state governments.

While primarily an academic endeavor, such research could indirectly benefit insurers, providers, and patients by informing more balanced mandate designs—potentially improving coverage while containing costs.

Source of Idea:
This idea was taken from https://sites.temple.edu/jamesbailey/ideas/ and further developed using an algorithm.
Skills Needed to Execute This Idea:
Health Policy AnalysisEconometricsData CollectionStatistical ModelingHealthcare SystemsDifference-In-Differences AnalysisLiterature ReviewAcademic WritingPolicy DisseminationGrant WritingRegulatory KnowledgeHealthcare EconomicsQuantitative Research
Resources Needed to Execute This Idea:
MEPS-IC Dataset AccessEconometric Analysis SoftwareHealth Policy Grant Funding
Categories:Healthcare Policy ResearchEconometric AnalysisPublic Health StudiesHealth Insurance MandatesPolicy Impact EvaluationHealthcare Economics

Hours To Execute (basic)

2000 hours to execute minimal version ()

Hours to Execute (full)

1200 hours to execute full idea ()

Estd No of Collaborators

1-10 Collaborators ()

Financial Potential

$0–1M Potential ()

Impact Breadth

Affects 100K-10M people ()

Impact Depth

Significant Impact ()

Impact Positivity

Probably Helpful ()

Impact Duration

Impacts Lasts Decades/Generations ()

Uniqueness

Moderately Unique ()

Implementability

Very Difficult to Implement ()

Plausibility

Logically Sound ()

Replicability

Moderately Difficult to Replicate ()

Market Timing

Good Timing ()

Project Type

Research

Project idea submitted by u/idea-curator-bot.
Submit feedback to the team