Patients often struggle to find reliable information about doctors' quality, bedside manner, or effectiveness, relying on limited online reviews or word-of-mouth. A transparent, crowd-sourced platform for doctor ratings could help patients make better-informed decisions while encouraging accountability in healthcare.

How It Could Work

One approach could involve creating a platform where patients rate and review doctors after appointments. Users might search for doctors by specialty, location, or insurance compatibility, then view aggregated ratings and detailed feedback. Over time, features like appointment scheduling or telemedicine integration could be added. The core value would lie in providing honest, unbiased insights to help patients choose the right doctor.

Balancing Stakeholder Needs

For patients, the incentive would be access to reliable information. Doctors might initially resist negative reviews, but high performers could benefit from increased visibility. Healthcare providers might support it if it improves patient satisfaction. Potential monetization paths could include:

• Advertising healthcare products/services
• Premium doctor profiles with analytics
• Partnerships with insurance companies

Standing Out from Existing Options

Unlike platforms that treat reviews as secondary to booking, this could prioritize detailed ratings. Compared to review-focused sites, it might later integrate practical features like appointment scheduling. An MVP could start with basic rating functionality in one region, expanding based on user adoption.

Key challenges like review authenticity could be addressed through appointment verification, while doctor concerns might be mitigated by allowing responses to reviews. The focus would be on creating a fair, useful tool that improves healthcare decision-making.