Advocacy plays a crucial role in driving social change, but there's little understanding of how the number of advocates in a given area affects the discovery and implementation of cost-effective solutions. Without this knowledge, organizations and policymakers may misallocate resources, missing opportunities to maximize impact where it matters most.
One way to explore this could involve a three-pronged approach:
This could reveal optimal advocate-to-population ratios and help stakeholders understand where additional advocacy efforts would be most valuable.
The findings could help:
For execution, one might start with a literature review and small pilot study before scaling up. Initial challenges like defining "advocates" could be addressed through proxy metrics and local partnerships.
Unlike existing advocacy research tools that focus on individual organizations or financial inputs, this approach would provide a geographic perspective on how advocate numbers correlate with real-world impact. It could complement current resources by adding empirical evidence about collective advocacy effectiveness across regions.
While data limitations in some areas pose challenges, focusing first on regions with robust information could yield valuable insights that might later be adapted for data-scarce environments.
Hours To Execute (basic)
Hours to Execute (full)
Estd No of Collaborators
Financial Potential
Impact Breadth
Impact Depth
Impact Positivity
Impact Duration
Uniqueness
Implementability
Plausibility
Replicability
Market Timing
Project Type
Research