Many knowledge-sharing events like conferences and workshops struggle with maintaining meaningful engagement after the event ends. While attendees gain valuable insights during the event, these often remain isolated rather than being shared and built upon collectively. This represents a missed opportunity for both organizers wanting to demonstrate event value and participants who could benefit from others' perspectives.
One way to address this could be through a systematic method combining discussion prompts with targeted outreach. This might involve:
This differs from standard post-event surveys by focusing on public, community-building interactions rather than private feedback collection. The approach could benefit event organizers through richer impact understanding, attendees through continued networking opportunities, and even those who couldn't attend through access to distilled insights.
A simple MVP might involve:
For full implementation, this could expand to standardized engagement prompt templates, systems for tracking potential contributors, and multiple content repurposing formats. Potential monetization approaches might include offering it as a premium post-event service for organizers or creating sponsored summary documents.
Unlike private post-event surveys, this creates ongoing community value. Compared to generic event discussion sections, it offers more focused prompts and outreach for higher-quality contributions. And unlike social media hashtag aggregation, it provides coherent discussion threads with facilitated reflection rather than scattered posts.
This approach might work particularly well for knowledge-focused events with engaged attendees, potentially creating a new standard for post-event engagement that benefits all stakeholders.
Hours To Execute (basic)
Hours to Execute (full)
Estd No of Collaborators
Financial Potential
Impact Breadth
Impact Depth
Impact Positivity
Impact Duration
Uniqueness
Implementability
Plausibility
Replicability
Market Timing
Project Type
Service