Many individuals dedicate their high-earning careers to donating money to effective charities, even when their skills could create more impact through direct work like research or policy leadership. This mismatch happens because comparing donation impact versus direct work impact is difficult, and switching careers often involves financial risks. Redirecting even a few such individuals could significantly increase social benefits.
One way to address this could be for a philanthropic fund to "buy out" an individual’s donation commitments, allowing them to transition into more impactful roles. For example, if someone donates $100k annually but has greater potential as a climate policy researcher, a fund could donate $50k/year for 2-3 years to offset their lost contributions. This buy-out could take different forms:
Three groups stand to benefit:
This approach aligns incentives: individuals maximize impact, funders optimize social return per dollar, and charities balance short-term and long-term gains.
A trial could start with 5-10 individuals, assessing their direct-work potential through interviews and skills tests. Contracts would specify buy-out terms, such as partial donation replacement contingent on entering agreed roles. Challenges include:
Existing efforts like Open Philanthropy’s grants or 80,000 Hours’ career coaching don’t specifically address financial lock-in from donation commitments. Unlike general donation funds, this idea integrates funding with talent allocation for greater impact.
Hours To Execute (basic)
Hours to Execute (full)
Estd No of Collaborators
Financial Potential
Impact Breadth
Impact Depth
Impact Positivity
Impact Duration
Uniqueness
Implementability
Plausibility
Replicability
Market Timing
Project Type
Service