Academic research in fields like economics often produces rigorous work, but its real-world policy impact remains inconsistent. This gap exists because academic incentives prioritize theoretical novelty over practical applicability, and there are few structured opportunities for researchers to engage directly with policymakers. One way to bridge this divide could be through a specialized conference co-organized by a funding body and a top-tier academic journal.

How It Could Work

The idea involves an annual or biennial conference where a funder partners with a prestigious economics journal to focus on a specific policy challenge—like climate economics or labor market shifts. Researchers would submit papers, with the most policy-relevant work receiving funding and potential publication in a special journal issue. Policymakers and practitioners would attend as discussants, creating a direct feedback loop between research and real-world application. For example, a conference on "AI and Labor Markets" might feature academic presentations alongside roundtables with government officials implementing workforce policies.

Why Stakeholders Might Participate

• Researchers could gain funding, high-profile publications, and tangible policy influence.
• Policymakers would access curated, actionable insights without sifting through less relevant academic work.
• Journals might see increased submissions and societal impact, while funders could align research with their mission.

Starting Small and Scaling

A pilot could test the concept by partnering with one journal and funder on a narrowly defined theme. Instead of waiting for full journal publication, proceedings or policy briefs might quickly disseminate findings. Success could be measured through policy citations or follow-up collaborations between researchers and attendees. Existing models like NBER conferences show demand for themed academic gatherings, but this approach would add stronger policy integration and journal-backed incentives.