Human Guided Q Learning With Attention Biasing

Human Guided Q Learning With Attention Biasing

Summary: Current reinforcement learning systems struggle to efficiently incorporate human expertise without limiting autonomous learning. The idea proposes modifying Q-Learning to softly bias the algorithm's attention based on human input about promising features or actions, maintaining exploration while accelerating learning with expert guidance in safety-critical domains.

Traditional reinforcement learning systems, particularly those using Q-Learning, often require extensive trial-and-error to achieve good performance. While humans can intuitively recognize effective strategies in many domains, there's currently no straightforward way to incorporate this human insight into the learning process without completely overriding the system's autonomous learning capability.

Human-Guided Learning Through Attention

One approach could be to modify standard Q-Learning by introducing a mechanism where human input gently biases the algorithm's "attention" - influencing how it weights different features or potential actions before making decisions. This wouldn't force specific actions, but would focus the algorithm's consideration on directions that human experts find promising. The process might work like this:

  1. The system presents state information in a human-interpretable format
  2. A domain expert provides input about potentially important features or actions
  3. The system adjusts its attention weights based on this input
  4. Normal Q-Learning proceeds, but with this human-influenced focus

Potential Applications and Advantages

This method could be particularly valuable in scenarios where:

  • Training time needs to be reduced in domains where human expertise exists
  • Safety-critical applications require human oversight
  • Domain experts want to contribute knowledge without deep ML expertise

Compared to existing approaches like TAMER or Deep Q-Learning from Human Preferences, this method differs by specifically targeting the attention mechanism and allowing pre-action guidance, which might lead to more efficient learning while maintaining autonomous exploration benefits.

Implementation Pathway

A practical way to test this concept could begin with:

  1. Developing the mathematical formulation for attention biasing
  2. Creating a prototype in simple environments (like grid worlds)
  3. Testing with controlled human input patterns
  4. Evaluating performance against standard Q-Learning
  5. Gradually scaling to more complex environments

Key challenges would include ensuring human guidance doesn't trap the system in local optima, which might be addressed by gradually reducing human influence as learning progresses.

This approach could offer a middle ground between fully autonomous learning and completely human-directed systems, potentially making reinforcement learning more accessible and efficient in expert domains.

Source of Idea:
This idea was taken from https://humancompatible.ai/bibliography and further developed using an algorithm.
Skills Needed to Execute This Idea:
Reinforcement LearningQ-Learning AlgorithmsHuman-Computer InteractionAttention Mechanism DesignMachine Learning PrototypingFeature WeightingAlgorithm EvaluationMathematical ModelingHuman Expertise IntegrationLearning System Optimization
Resources Needed to Execute This Idea:
AI Training InfrastructureHuman Interpretable Interface SoftwareQ-Learning Algorithm Framework
Categories:Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningReinforcement LearningHuman-Computer InteractionCognitive SystemsAlgorithm Optimization

Hours To Execute (basic)

1000 hours to execute minimal version ()

Hours to Execute (full)

500 hours to execute full idea ()

Estd No of Collaborators

1-10 Collaborators ()

Financial Potential

$10M–100M Potential ()

Impact Breadth

Affects 1K-100K people ()

Impact Depth

Substantial Impact ()

Impact Positivity

Probably Helpful ()

Impact Duration

Impacts Lasts 3-10 Years ()

Uniqueness

Highly Unique ()

Implementability

Very Difficult to Implement ()

Plausibility

Logically Sound ()

Replicability

Moderately Difficult to Replicate ()

Market Timing

Good Timing ()

Project Type

Research

Project idea submitted by u/idea-curator-bot.
Submit feedback to the team